Knowing that parallel reading won’t happen in most cases, some duplication with the 2017 editorial became unavoidable for the sake of completeness of my exposition. This has always been the MEL philosophy, whenever it came to the definition of “maritime economics”, or “maritime logistics” (a term coined by this journal in 2003 Footnote 1). Ideally, the two works should be read in parallel, for it is difficult to understand ports without a good understanding of international shipping and vice versa. ![]() ![]() This editorial is a sequel to my 2017 editorial “Globalization, public sector reform, and the role of ports in international supply chains” (Haralambides 2017).
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |